Subject: Re: [boost] Question about useful libraries
From: Greg Rubino (bibil.thaysose_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-29 09:54:19
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Mathias Gaunard
> On 06/28/2011 01:17 PM, Sebastian Karlsson wrote:
>> Secondly an XML parser /
>> writer can be written to a very high quality using the libraries
>> already present in boost ( spirit& iostreams comes to mind )
> A spirit-based XML parser doesn't seem that great.
> If using semantic actions, it would necessarily be SAX-like.
> If using attributes, it would be like the DOM, and you would have to be
> careful not to copy everywhere.
I didn't get a chance to read this before my last post. These are
some good points.
> My impression was that Pull-like interfaces -- lazy parsing of XML as it is
> being iterated -- were more popular.
This couldn't be accomplished with Spirit? That sounds like a challenge...
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk