Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] basic mutex problem
From: àÒ¦Ê úÕÂÒÉÃØËÉÊ (mt.wizard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-13 05:42:32
What do I see is that you hold const reference to ptime in
random_activity_planner, but pass it by value to ctor. This isn't
correct, as const reference prolongs life of ctor parameter only until
ctor body end. Try changing either of these places (hold by value or
pass by cref).
Looks like when you don't threads stack place where copied ptime lived
isn't reused, but with threads it is rewritten.
2011/8/13 Greg Rubino <bibil.thaysose_at_[hidden]>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Christian Holmquist
> <c.holmquist_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> Also, I am aware that I don't need to be
> >> using threads here, but I am, and I don't understand why it's not
> >> working.
> > Does the code do the right thing if you remove the threads and just call
> > random_activity_planner(activities,origin)();
> > directly?
> Hi Christian,
> Thanks for the quick response! I tried that and it behaves as
> expected if I remove the uses of boost::thread_group. That is, the
> container grows to activity_count elements and they are all properly
> initialized with random elements.
> > - Christian
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk