Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] The Lonely Song of the MPL Maintainer -- or Boost support for antediluvian compiler and the future supprot of C++11
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-16 01:07:06


Perhaps you might want to consider making a newer version of the mpl library
and call it mpl2. This new version would work only be guarenteed to work on
the most modern compilers. The advantages of doing this would be

a) You wouldn't have to compromise by trying to support older compilers
b) You could work at peace since the current mpl would be around for the
forseeable future
c) by using mpl2 namespace and directory - there would be no conflict with
the current version. Users could select one or the other.
d) Review/criticism etc would be simpler since the current version would
still be around.

Robert Ramey


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk