[boost] [type traits] Extension to operator detection -> choose your preferred naming

Subject: [boost] [type traits] Extension to operator detection -> choose your preferred naming
From: Brent Spillner (spillner_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-25 07:03:29

On 8/24/2011 07:23 Frederic Bron wrote:
> Please give your preference between A, B and C before Sept. 5th.

Of these three choices, I think C is easiest to live with.  However,
if you're going to have has_unary_plus I think the symmetry of
has_unary_minus is preferable to has_negate, and I continue to believe
that an additional has_operator<Tag, TypeA, TypeB> (or
can_call_operator<>) should be provided for use in more generic code
(e.g. forwarding ETs from a higher level without caring exactly which
operators are involved.)

Brent