Subject: Re: [boost] [Endian] Review
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-09 15:20:13
Le 09/09/11 15:05, Beman Dawes a écrit :
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Vicente Botet<vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>wrote:
>> I have separated the endian class into a endian_pack that is integer
>> agnostic and an endian class that behaves as an integer (You could see the
>> details in the Sandbox under endian_ext).
>> Reference docs:
>> (Sorry but there is a bad link to the reference)
>> This is not complex
> Complexity is in the eye of the beholder. To me, that approach was markedly
> more complex and confusing.
What do you find complex in separating the classes endian_pack and endian?
>> and allows to define physical structures that can be
>> used only at the I/O frontier.
> See my reply to Phil Endecott (this morning, 9/9/11) for an example of doing
Well, IIUC your replay doesn't force the separation of concerns. Of
course, the user of such a structure could do the separation, but the
interface doesn't force it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk