Re: [boost] [Review:Algorithms] is_ordered name

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review:Algorithms] is_ordered name
From: Marshall Clow (mclow.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-24 12:07:19

On Sep 24, 2011, at 6:12 AM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
> On a side note, I think the algorithm can be trivially implemented
> using adjacent_find, and should have the same iterator requirements.
> 
> return adjacent_find(f, l, not2(pred));

Yes, it can - but that places requirements on the predicate that the current implementation does not.

-- Marshall

Marshall Clow     Idio Software   <mailto:mclow.lists_at_[hidden]>

A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).
        -- Yu Suzuki