Re: [boost] Interest in StaticVector - fixed capacity vector

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in StaticVector - fixed capacity vector
From: Andrew Hundt (athundt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-14 11:19:37

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Paul A. Bristow
<pbristow_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> push_back_unchecked ?
>
> Then it will appear in the sensible place in any alphabetical list of functions.
>

I was thinking about that, but from what I've read on the list it
seems people prefer clearer and more correct english in the function
names whenever possible.

The one I keep coming across is:
put_back()

 Does that currently imply anything I'm not thinking of? It seems like
something someone would look up if they haven't seen it, then use it
correctly. It does not directly imply unchecked, but it does seem
appropriate.

Cheers!
Andrew Hundt