Subject: Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Status?
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-08 10:40:49
On 11/8/2011 6:06 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> There are still a lot of release branch regression test failures. It
> is very uncomfortable to see failures for popular compilers such as
> VC++ 10 and GCC:
> accumulators (most or all compilers)
These tests broke several releases ago due to a change in Boost.Random,
which is only used in the Accumulator's regression tests. Steven assures
me it's not due to a bug in Random, but I still have my doubts.
Regardless, I haven't had the time to investigate, so the tests have
stayed broken. There is nothing wrong with Boost.Accumulators, though.
-- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk