Subject: Re: [boost] Are some of the trunk regression tests running in C++0x mode when they shouldn't be?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-10 20:13:20
Christopher Jefferson <chris <at> bubblescope.net> writes:
> There are two problems with enabling C++11 unconditionally in gcc:
> 1) It breaks binary compatability of some stl containers
Does this mean that library and executable needs to be built with the same value
of this flag?
> 2) Different versions of gcc support different amounts of C++11.
> g++ 4.5 at least.
I am fine with enabling it for gcc 4.5+
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk