Subject: Re: [boost] Alternative implementation for BOOST_PP_VARIADIC_SIZE
From: Lorenzo Caminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-16 04:18:00
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 3:13 AM, Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt <at> loria.fr> writes:
>> Paul Mensonides <pmenso57 <at> comcast.net> writes:
>> > The bottom line is that there is no general way to interact with the
>> > argument that doesn't cause compiler errors with some input.
>> Please, be more concrete and show me such an input.
> since there is no reply so far to my questions I conclude that you
> don't have any concrete example, what a pitty
It is not uncommon for people on this ML to reply within 1-2 days or
over ~1 week (that is because most people on this ML are also busy
with work-- a project release, etc). Occasionally, a thread gets a
back and forth of replies within hours but that is the norm only for
library review threads.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk