Subject: Re: [boost] temp_ptr<> - preventing use as a member
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-17 01:26:20
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> on Sun Nov 13 2011, Gottlob Frege <gottlobfrege-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>> The only thing, I think, that I can't prevent, is construction of a
>> new wrapper struct that has a temp_ptr as a member (which is copy
>> constructed in wrapper's constructor). Can anyone think of a way to
>> prevent that?
> I'm pretty sure there's no way to do that.
Thinking about it more, I realize that *in debug* I could probably
write some strange code that detects whether the copies are going into
objects on the stack or not. Not very portable to say the least.
>> I think anyone that goes out of their way to make a wrapper struct
>> gets what they deserve, so I don't really *need* to prevent all bad
>> uses. But I can aslo imagine someone just using it improperly inside
>> their class due to misunderstanding or whatever.
>> And thoughts on the goal of specific smart pointers for all occasions?
> Sounds interesting; I'd like to know how it turns out for you in
I wish I had 6 months to try it out and now had answers. People are
requesting guidance *now*. We'll see...
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk