Subject: Re: [boost] Library categories
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-23 13:08:24
Le 22/11/11 23:56, Daniel James a écrit :
> On 22 November 2011 22:18, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I have committed the proposed changes as suggested in
>> Please, let me know if there is something wrong with the new categories.
> I've had a quick look and it's good. The following is all IMO so do
> disregard if you disagree. I find some of the new categories to be
> quite specific, but then so are some of the old ones.
Have you a concrete proposal of categories that can be merged or removed?
> I don't like
> 'Idioms' and 'patterns' much, maybe they could be combined, or does
> that contradict your intent?
No, Idioms and Patterns is Ok. I'll merge them.
> Miscellaneous should probably stay at the
> end, and not contain libraries that now have another home.
OK. I will put all the categories ordered lexicographically and move
Miscellaneous to the end.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk