Subject: Re: [boost] New libraries implementing C++11 features in C++03
From: Lorenzo Caminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-24 11:49:22
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Dean Michael Berris
>> 3) [MOST IMPORTANT OF ALL] This thread is about "should new libraries
>> implementing C++11 features in C++03" be considered for admission in
>> Boost or not. It's not about the usefulness of Local, namespace,
>> struct, Phoenix, etc. Let's all try to provide the review manager with
>> this piece of information about C++11, C++03, and Boost.
> But I've already done that part -- see my first response.
> I responded to your post because you brought up the comparison with
> Phoenix. I don't know if you noticed but the context of my whole reply
> was exactly that, the relationship between C++11, C++03, and Boost
> where the case in point is the Local library under review.
OK, can you please summarize your position with respect to C++11 and
C++03 libraries here for me once again? Just a couple of sentences
will be enough. Thanks a lot :)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk