Subject: Re: [boost] [local] Any "active Boost library author" in favor of Boost.Local
From: Brian Wood (woodbrian77_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-25 01:41:23
> Hello all,
> I will be honest: The fact that some of the people arguing for not
> including Boost.Local are "active Boost library authors" (Thomas,
> Joel, and Hartmut) seems to make their opinion weight more than the
> opinion of others that have also submitted a review for the library.
> Two questions:
> 1) Should reviews from "active Boost library authors" carry more
> weight? (This is /not/ a rhetoric question.)
> 2) Is there any "active Boost library author" out there that is in
> favor of including Boost.Local? (If so, please say so by replying to
> this thread.)
I'm in favor of accepting it. Not because I plan to use it, but think
Boost could use the help and you have been learning the ropes.
Regardless of the outcome of the review, I like the tenacity
you've shown. I'm not a Boost library author.
-- Brian Wood Ebenezer Enterprises http://webEbenezer.net <http://webebenezer.net/>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk