Subject: Re: [boost] Library categories
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-29 13:37:08
Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> I was wondering if we can add other categories to the library catalog
> Here is a proposal
> Domain Specific
There have been complaints about "domain specific" being too vague, but code that is, by its nature, not as general as you'd expect to see in the Standard Library, fits. Having said that, Units seems to be more miscellaneous than domain specific. However, if "Math and Numerics" were just Math, then Units would fit there.
> Patterns: libraries that implement a known pattern
I like the Patterns and Idioms grouping.
> Language Emulation: these are libraries are emulating a missing language
> State Machines
> meta state machine
That seems too small a group. Isn't a state machine a pattern?
> System: libraries that are close to the underlying system
> I would add also the following to exixting categories
> Data structures
> optional - Discriminated-union wrapper for optional values, from
> Fernando Cacciola.
> tribool - 3-state boolean type library, from Doug Gregor.
Perhaps "Simple Data Structures" would be a better name to disambiguate between data structures and containers.
Should Graph be in Containers? There aren't any containers in that library, are there?
I was going to state that a category with just one entry is unjustified, and one with but two entries is questionable. However, there's some value in having more categories, even with just one entry, since a searcher may not pick the same category as we do for a given library's functionality. Thus, while "Parsing" has just one entry, it is an important category and Spirit would be missed by someone looking for a parsing library.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer using std::disclaimer;
Dev Tools & Components
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk