Subject: Re: [boost] Add macros for the "enum class" concept?
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-12 09:02:49
Daryle Walker wrote
>> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 12:55:33 +0000
>> From: dnljms@
>> On 12 December 2011 12:46, Daryle Walker <darylew@> wrote:
>> > Should we add preprocessor stuff to conditionally use the C++11 "enum
>> class" construct?
>> We have something like that already:
> Reading it, it doesn't have any base type and/or forward-declaration
How do you want to be able to use forward declaration in a portable way?
There are also scoped enums with underlying type that are no enum class.
These could be added as well.
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Add-macros-for-the-enum-class-concept-tp4185837p4186071.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk