Subject: Re: [boost] [context] 4 days left on Boost.Context mini-review
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-08 19:58:09
Giovanni Piero Deretta wrote:
> Hi All,
> This is a call for reviewers for Boost.Context. The mini review period
> will end the 11th of this month and we only had 1 review so far and we
> were expecting a few more.
> We had some interesting discussions on the original review period and
> quite a few people were involved, so anybody who has an interest in
> boost.context please write a review.
> thank you all,
I've been very pleased with your coroutine library for some time. I liked
the complete documentation. I aways wondered why it wasn't reviewed
and accepted into boost. For my own purposes I made a couple of
tweaks which made it header only - when helped me a lot.
I looked over the documentation of this library. My question is: what is the
relationship between this library and your coroutine library. Would this
be a lower level component of the coroutine library. What are the future
plans for the coroutine library - if any. I had presumed you just lost
interest in persuing a boost revew and just dropped of the map, Now
I see you're handling the review for this component. Is there any
back story here?
Downloading from the git repo - clicking on the link - in the documentation
didn't work for me. Is there alternative way to get the source to have
I was curious to know whether there is a good reason for not making
it header only.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk