Re: [boost] [hash] regular behaviour of hash function for double values

Subject: Re: [boost] [hash] regular behaviour of hash function for double values
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-01 16:01:49

On 1 February 2012 20:15, Topher Cooper <topher_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 2/1/2012 3:59 AM, Daniel James wrote:
>>
>> The STL hash containers are pretty much required to be implemented
>> using a chained hash table.

Note that I said 'pretty much required', not 'required'.

> I've seen that claim, and I might well be missing something, but I believe
> that coalesced hashing would also work.

Container elements can be uncopyable and unmovable.