Subject: Re: [boost] PCL - Portable C++ Library
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-10 10:01:53
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Christof Donat <cd_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> The Qt developers don't want to.
> So I guess, you have asked them. That would be a reason to try and produce
> something new that can compete with Qt and fits better into the standard
> environment. Is there any interest in here to look into what we could learn
> from their design?
Why would that be better? Does it make code using Qt easier / simpler?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk