Subject: Re: [boost] [PREDEF] Review for the Boost.Predef library by Rene Riviera
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-24 08:49:37
On 02/24/2012 03:33 AM, Edward Diener wrote:
> The current Boost.Config has one header per compiler so obviously it
> does make sense. Another header attempts to figure out the compiler
> being used and then the particular compiler's header is included. What
> is so arcane about that ?
Those are not "real" headers. You're not allowed to ever include one of
Including any of those directly would open a whole can of worms. They
don't even have include guards or anything of the sort.
It could be argued that the extension should be changed from .hpp to .inl.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk