Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Status of proposed boost.overload?
From: lcaminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-24 19:15:38


calembour wrote
>
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 23:07:34 +0100, niXman <i.nixman@> wrote:
>
>> Hello list!
>>
>> boost.overload: http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/overload/
>>
>> The library will be accepted into the boost libraries ?
>>
>
> Hi,
> well, lately I committed a new version to the boost sandbox that
> presents several new features and an improved documentation.
> I never proposed the library for review, I'm still waiting for
> feedbacks from the boost community.
> If you have interesting use cases, I'd like to hear from you.
> Here, you can find the library documentation:
> http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/overload/trunk/libs/overload/docs/html/index.html
>

How's this different from:
http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/trunk/libs/functional/overloaded_function/doc/html/index.html

Boost.Functional/OverloadedFunction was reviewed and accepted as part of the
Boost.Local(Function) review. OverloadedFunction should in the next release.

--Lorenzo

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Status-of-proposed-boost-overload-tp4500266p4502352.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk