Subject: Re: [boost] C++11 Metaprogramming
From: Andrew Sutton (asutton.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-05 11:53:57
>> Actually, so are a number of other techniques discussed in this
>> thread, or variations of them. The code to expand a tuple as function
>> arguments looks very familiar.
> I'm sure. Are there any other parts of origin you'd recommend I take a
> look at?
You might look at the traits library and the concept emulation work.
The approach is a little different than what I usually see on the
The kind of metaprogramming that I usually use is pretty limited to
that style. I haven't found the need for anything more general.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk