Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Modularization: did we get it right?
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-08 11:40:25

> As we head toward a modularized Boost, Daniel Pfeifer we on the Ryppl
> project would like confirmation that we've correctly (or at least
> sensibly, when there's no obvious "correct") identified the module
> boundaries in Boost's monolithic SVN repository.  If library authors
> could take a few moments to examine the contents of your library's repo
> at https://github.com/boost-lib, and let us know, we'd be most grateful.

I haven't tried to use it, but at first glance the files for regex, math, 
type_traits, TR1 and integer all look right.  No doubt all the relative 
paths in the docs will be wrong though (if they have full relative paths to 
the headers)?

HTH, John.