Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: [boost] [tuple] Type composition
From: Amir Ansari (amir.ansari80_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-20 00:52:36


I like to reuse tuple<> to quickly create new types as:   class my_data : public boost::tuple<int, int, bool, int> {   // The following could go into a macro:   enum { Id, Price, Sellable, Shares, Gain } // Ensure copy constructor my_data(const my_data & d) : boost::tuple<int, int, bool, int>(d) {}   };   The enum and copy constructor could be defined using a macro whose signature is:   HANDLE_TUPLE4(Class, Type1, Name1, Type2, Name2, Type3, Name3, Type4, Name4)   I find this to be a lot less clutter than:   class my_data { int Id; int Price; bool Sellable; int Shares; int Gain;   // Boiler plate code... };   Users of my_data can now access members as obj.get<my_data::Id>() The only thing in the above is that I can't declare the data to be protected so that users of my_data won't be able to do get<my_data::Price> = 0; for example. Ideally there should be a way so that some of the data members could be private to my_data and not exposed to even derived classes but I don't see a way for that. But protected could be handled through a slight modification in tuple:   enum AccessSpecifier { Protected, Public }   template< enum AccessSpecifier, typename... Args> class typle...   template<typename.. Args> class tuple<Protected, Args...> // Make sure Args are declared protected   With some specialization magic, we can let users define which arguments should be public (that is, the get<> method) and which should be protected. Does this make sense? I think we could add more magic so that users can only get and NOT set the values. Thoughts?


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk