Re: [boost] Interest in a GPU computing library

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a GPU computing library
From: Manjunath Kudlur (keveman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-19 16:18:01

>
>
>> *Every* function in Proto? Or the just ones that build Proto
>> expressions? Or evaluate them? Or some other subset?
>>
>
> The ones to evaluate them.
> value, proto_base and child_c could be a usable subset.
>
>
I have attempted this once before. I remember parts of Boost.Fusion needed
the annotation too.

Manjunath

> Older CUDA versions were a bit broken, and easily had internal compiler
> errors. At MetaScale we actually translate Proto expressions to our custom
> expression types for CUDA to avoid this, but maybe straight Proto could
> work well enough now.
> As a side node, it also allows use to have shorter symbol names, which was
> a bit of a problem with Proto.
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/**
> mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost<http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost>
>