Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?

Subject: Re: [boost] What Should we do About Boost.Test?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-28 19:54:41

Sergey Popov <loonycyborg <at> gmail.com> writes:

> > > I would like it 
> > > if I could build Boost.Test libraries
> > > (libboost_unit_test_framework*) without the monitor stuff
> > > (libboost_test_exec_monitor* and libboost_prg_exec_monitor*).
> > 
> > Is this a joke? Former is deprecated long ago and later has nothing
> > to do with unit testing. And either one has nothing to do with unit
> > test framework.
> The point here that both libs are built by ./b2 --with-test. And
> considering what you said above it would be nice if they were
> considered a separate lib for purposes of --with-whatever..

I know nothing about b2 or with-test, but whomever is responsible feel free to 
stop building these (especially test execution monitor).

Gennadiy