Re: [boost] Inspect Report

Subject: Re: [boost] Inspect Report
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-06 14:39:14

(Rearranging...)

On 12/6/2012 11:26 AM, Rene Rivera wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
>> On 12/6/2012 1:17 AM, Daniel James wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The snapshot builds and inspect results haven't been running for some
>>> time, so I've added running the inspect script to the documentation
>>> build for more up to date results. You can see them at:
>>>
>>> http://boost.cowic.de/rc/docs-inspect-trunk.html
>>> http://boost.cowic.de/rc/docs-inspect-release.html
>>>
>>> These are generated after building documentation, which is not exactly
>>> the same as the final release, but it's close.
>>
>> For the accumulators library, the xml files its complaining about are
>> generated as part of the doc build. Is there some way to get inspect to
>> ignore them?
> 
> If they are generated intermediate files why check them in at all?
> 

They're not. As Daniel says, he ran inspect after doing a doc build.
This reduces the number of bogus "broken link" failures, but adds these
others.

-- 
Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com