Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [predef] Status and review results?
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-09 06:39:05

Next message: Beman Dawes: "[boost] Git Modularization Review no vote heads-up"
Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [chrono/date] conversion between concrete dates"
In reply to: Petr Machata: "Re: [boost] [predef] Status and review results?"
Next in thread: Ioannis Papadopoulos: "Re: [boost] [predef] Status and review results?"

On 04/23/2013 05:08 PM, Petr Machata wrote:

> Right. What I meant to say was that __SYSC_ZARCH__ is not defined by
> GCC at all. On GCC, __s390__ is the define for both, and __s390x__
> explicitly for the 64-bit one.

I just noticed that clang defines __zarch__ in addition to __s390__ and
__s390x__.

Next message: Beman Dawes: "[boost] Git Modularization Review no vote heads-up"
Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [chrono/date] conversion between concrete dates"
In reply to: Petr Machata: "Re: [boost] [predef] Status and review results?"
Next in thread: Ioannis Papadopoulos: "Re: [boost] [predef] Status and review results?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk