Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?
From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-08 04:35:13

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
Previous message: Daryle Walker: "[boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
In reply to: Daryle Walker: "[boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
Next in thread: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
Reply: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
Previous message: Daryle Walker: "[boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
In reply to: Daryle Walker: "[boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
Next in thread: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
Reply: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk