Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] boost.range bug in transformed or sliced
From: John Reid (j.reid_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-09 04:39:16

Next message: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?"
In reply to: Nathan Ridge: "Re: [boost] boost.range bug in transformed or sliced"

On 09/06/13 03:39, Nathan Ridge wrote:
> John, please file a Trac ticket so we don't lose track of this issue. I
> will look into it when I get a chance.

OK I can work around this now whether it is a defect or not. The ticket
is here:

https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8676

Thanks all for info on the issue.

Next message: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?"
In reply to: Nathan Ridge: "Re: [boost] boost.range bug in transformed or sliced"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk