Re: [boost] [shared_array] Why not in C++11 ?

Subject: Re: [boost] [shared_array] Why not in C++11 ?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-07-06 14:20:32

Sid Sacek wrote:
> Does anyone know why 'boost::shared_array<>' was not made part of C++11, 
> since pretty much all the other smart pointers were?

As others already said, we only proposed shared_ptr and weak_ptr for TR1 
(and then C++11).

A related question is why shared_ptr<T[]> is not in C++14, and the answer 
here is that I proposed it just a bit too late for it to be considered.

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3640.html