Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] testers blocked after changeset 85924 in trunk.
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-29 09:24:32


2013/9/29 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>

> On Sunday 29 September 2013 13:33:52 Daniel James wrote:
> > On 28 September 2013 21:05, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > As of few minutes ago I was getting a missing target in the variant
> lib.
> > > Which I have commented out so that testing can progress. Hopefully
> that's
> > > enough to repair the stalled testing.
> >
> > This kind of thing happens a lot. Would it be possible for the test
> > toolset to check for missing files and report a failed test rather
> > than breaking the whole build?
>
> I think, a more general solution would be to do this for any targets, not
> just
> tests.
>

I like that idea. It would be also great if incorrect format of
explicit-failures-markup.xml file won't be treated as fatal error, but
rather the whole explicit-failures-markup.xml file would be ignored.

-- 
Best regards,
Antony Polukhin

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk