Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Anyone is interested in being review manager of ‘Application’?
From: Renato Forti (rtforti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-08 07:48:27


Hi,

>> I think also you might consider acting a review manager for another library
before asking anyone to act as review manager for yours.

I am a not very active user! But I would like to help community. We have a
lot of good libs on schedule for long time that I would like to see in
boost. What is needed to become a Review Manager?

Other suggestion, I think that proposed libs should be in a place like more
prominently on the ‘boost’ site (as a direct link)! Something like:
libraries proposals awaiting review.

So users can have direct access to these libraries, test them and give
feedback to the authors.

I think that : Community -> Review -> Schedule (
http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html) don’t promote
discussion about the proposed libs. Well this is only a suggestion!

Thanks

Renato

2014-05-07 6:22 GMT-03:00 Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]>:

> On 5 May 2014 at 15:58, Sohail Somani wrote:
>
> > > The proposed `Boost.Application´, needs a Review Manager. Anyone is
> > > interested?
>
> I think also you might consider acting a review manager for another
> library before asking anyone to act as review manager for yours.
> We'll never process the queue if everyone wants but no one wants to
> give.
>
> Getting your library reviewed is more about crossing off any possible
> reasons why it shouldn't be reviewed rather than making a case for
> that it should be reviewed.
>
> Niall
>
> --
> ned Productions Limited Consulting
> http://www.nedproductions.biz/
> http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk