Re: [boost] [optional] Changes in Boost.Optional

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Changes in Boost.Optional
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-01 15:47:47

On 9/1/2014 11:48 AM, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> On Tue Aug 26 2014 at 3:59:12 PM Dean Michael Berris <mikhailberis_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue Aug 26 2014 at 9:38:37 AM Eric Niebler <eniebler_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/24/2014 11:20 AM, Rob Stewart wrote:
>>>> [Corrected subject to target optional.]
>>>>
>>>> On August 24, 2014 7:55:11 AM EDT, Dean Michael Berris <
>>> mikhailberis_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>> I realize that this message may have not passed the spam filters.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can someone comment on the changes in Boost.Optional in 1.56.0 breaking
>>>>> existing code?
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> Hi Dean,
>>>
>>> I don't know the specifics, but if you file a bug, at least it won't get
>>> lost.
>>>
>>>
>> Filed: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/10399
>>
>> Thanks Eric.
>>
>
> It's now been almost a week and there's been no update on the issue. I
> think this is serious enough that I'm positive it couldn't just be me
> that's experiencing this regression.
>
> Can someone with access to MSVC 2010 confirm whether this indeed is an
> issue, and whether it's actually a regression?
>
> If I wanted to get a fix in for this, whom do I send the pull request to
> (community maintenance team) so it gets fixed for 1.57?

Just make a pull request against Boost Optional. Whoever is a Boost 
Optional maintainer will get the pull request. It is not up to you to 
have to determine, when making a pull request, who should get the request.