Re: [boost] [review] [sort] Sort library review manager results

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] [sort] Sort library review manager results
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-27 08:47:16

On 27/11/14 02:32, Edward Diener wrote:

> Review Result:
>
> Based on the voting for acceptance or not, based on the discussions
> during the review period, and based on Steven Ross's responses, I have
> decided that Steven Ross's library should be accepted into Boost.

I did not really participate in the review, but I did notice there was 
consensus that the documentation was not really satisfactory.

Was this issue already addressed during the review or will it be 
addressed during the integration period?