Re: [boost] [optional] operator<(optional<T>, T) -- is it wrong?

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] operator<(optional<T>, T) -- is it wrong?
From: Howard Hinnant (howard.hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-05 10:59:11

On Dec 5, 2014, at 8:16 AM, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Howard are there good reasons why your reference library for N3980
> hasn't been submitted to Boost for review and inclusion? With
> something like my forthcoming BindLib a single code base can be dual
> use, so both compilable as a Boost module and as a totally
> independent standalone library.

Good question.  Mainly lack of time on my part in packaging it.  I’ll give that issue some more thought.

Howard