Re: [boost] Futures (was: Re: [compute] Some remarks)

Subject: Re: [boost] Futures (was: Re: [compute] Some remarks)
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-13 08:38:48

On 12 Jan 2015 at 20:24, Rob Stewart wrote:

> > I do agree about BindLib being a poor name. It is actually onto its 
> > third choice of name now :( but to date, it's the least terrible of 
> > the reasonably descriptive library names I have thought of. 
> > 
> > Any better names gratefully received.
> 
> Name[space]Mapping

NameMappingLib or just plain NameMapping?

How about APIMapping? BindLib also provides API version management 
via preprocessor metaprogramming.

Would even APIBind be better?

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ 
http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/