Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] boost interval arithmetic
From: Павел Кудан (coodan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-15 07:54:06


>
>> OK, but that is enough to conclude that [-inf, inf] IS( [-inf, -1] U [1, inf]) is not true and this operator returns not correct result, no matter is the way it corrupts own result documented or not.
>>
>
>No, you are wrong here again, you claim so much but demonstrate nothing. You seem to lack the ability to reason precisely and mix up set theory with numerical interval computations.
>
>You should stick to pen and paper math, learn about logical inference
>
>(A and NOT(A))->proves the earth is flat
>
> ,lean about numerical representation theory (like floats) and don't touch a computer or post in forums until you do that!
>
>What in your opinion is the value of "d" in the following statement?
>
>
>double d=1/3;
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Or, may be you think that  /= operator which checks first if result interval is single and throw exception if not is too difficult to implement with division_part1/division_part2 functions?


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk