Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-03 18:54:16

Next message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version"
Previous message: Stephen Kelly: "Re: [boost] To split, or not to split, or something else? RE: type_traits rewrite, modularization, dependencies, etc."
In reply to: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"
Next in thread: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"
Reply: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"

On February 3, 2015 7:12:59 AM EST, Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]> wrote:

[snip]

Given all of the restrictions you've enumerated, it would seem that the right behavior is actually to test the existence of a possible result and the caller's permission to use it before returning.

___
Rob

(Sent from my portable computation engine)

Next message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version"
Previous message: Stephen Kelly: "Re: [boost] To split, or not to split, or something else? RE: type_traits rewrite, modularization, dependencies, etc."
In reply to: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"
Next in thread: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"
Reply: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk