Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatoryBoostlibraries
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-13 23:35:14

Next message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries"
Previous message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] [variant] 1.58 boost/variant/get.hpp compile errors"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatoryBoostlibraries"
Next in thread: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boostlibraries"

On 14 May 2015 at 3:13, Peter Dimov wrote:

> > Right now for most boost libraries the strictly needed dependencies are
> > all other Boost libraries.
>
> That's not quite true. See the report at
>
> http://www.pdimov.com/tmp/report-develop-08112c5/module-weights.html

Fascinating Peter.

I agree I was more wrong than right. Thanks for the correction.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ 
http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/

application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: SMime.p7s

Next message: Niall Douglas: "Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries"
Previous message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] [variant] 1.58 boost/variant/get.hpp compile errors"
In reply to: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatoryBoostlibraries"
Next in thread: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boostlibraries"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk