Re: [boost] [Hana] Formal review

Subject: Re: [boost] [Hana] Formal review
From: Louis Dionne (ldionne.2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-19 18:57:45

Joel de Guzman <djowel <at> gmail.com> writes:

> 
> [...]
>
> Let me just make this clear: I am for Hanna's acceptance into boost.
> It is cool and well implemented. Many people will find a use for it.
> It's just not for me.

I'm fine with that, really. But just to be clear, would you use a TMP 
library that would be basically Hana core:

- an efficient tuple implementation
- optimized algorithms (filter, transform, for_each, nothing fancy)
- no fancy FP concepts
- a couple of header files, no more

Would you use that, or would you still prefer to DIY?

Regards,
Louis