Re: [boost] Ternary logic programming (was: Re: [variant] Maintainer)

Subject: Re: [boost] Ternary logic programming (was: Re: [variant] Maintainer)
From: Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira (vini.ipsmaker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-02 23:15:11

2015-07-02 23:37 GMT-03:00 Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]>:

> Does this make sense?

Yes, thanks for summarizing. I'm starting to like this abstraction. I'll
let you know if I get any doubts about its design.

Now you just need to address Vicente's concern about the monad name. Maybe
rename result to light_result and monad to result.

-- 
Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira
https://about.me/vinipsmaker