Re: [boost] [Coroutine] Back to the caller

Subject: Re: [boost] [Coroutine] Back to the caller
From: Mikhail Strelnikov (mikhail.strelnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-18 09:45:11

> thy, you figured out a bug - a function call was missing (a bug fix will
> follow this evening).

I'm sorry for being so annoying, but by "missing" you mean you'll fix
Boost.Coroutine and will leave Boost.Coroutine2 as it is now?

I do understand that Lua is not a reference language, but its
behaviour matches Boost.Coroutine's behaviour -
https://ideone.com/3RWPKF and prints 122.

Again, I'm not saying this -
http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~roberto/docs/MCC15-04.pdf should be trusted
but it says that:

"Lua coroutine facilities implement our concept of full asymmetric
coroutines [Moura et al. 2004]"

May be you can add a parameter for user to choose which behaviour they want?

Thanks.