Re: [boost] Boost Evolution

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Evolution
From: Paul Fultz II (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-17 20:37:11

On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at 4:32:42 PM UTC-5, David Sankel wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Robert Ramey <ra..._at_[hidden] 
> <javascript:>> wrote: 
>
> > On 5/17/16 10:27 AM, David Sankel wrote: 
> > 
> >> This means life or death for boost and, frankly, 
> >> 
> > it's been dying over the past few years. 
> >> 
> > 
> > I think we're on a good path. 
>
>
>
> https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=%2Fm%2F034w42%2C%20cmake%2C%20bjam&cmpt=q&tz=Etc%2FGMT%2B6

I think that is a strong demonstration.