Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] What C++14/1z standard or TS libraries would you like to have available on a C++11 compiler?
From: Thijs (M.A.) van den Berg (thijs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-22 13:53:38

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] doctest - the lightest feature rich C++ single header testing framework - if it can enter boost and if it/boost will benefit from that"
Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] What C++14/1z standard or TS libraries would you like to have available on a C++11 compiler?"
In reply to: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] What C++14/1z standard or TS libraries would you like to have available on a C++11 compiler?"
Next in thread: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] What C++14/1z standard or TS libraries would you like to have available on a C++11 compiler?"
Reply: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] What C++14/1z standard or TS libraries would you like to have available on a C++11 compiler?"

> On 22 May 2016, at 19:06, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:.
>
> I would like to reduce dependencies to Boost libraries as much as possible.
>
Why?

Will it e.g. be released outside boost?

Wouldn't it have to be *completely* independent in that case?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk