|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Asynchronous library now in Boost Library Incubator
From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-12-04 09:56:21
> > I understood HPX as a library returning futures to calls to asynchronous
> functions, somewhat similar to std::async.
> > In that case, the main region with all the futures would be a thread
> world for asynchronous. In huge applications, this does not solve the
> problem of organizing thousands of objects within threads.
> > <<
Why not? You can easily (and I mean it) create asynchronous applications
solely using futures for defining the necessary dependencies between tasks,
running millions of tasks.
> > Yes, I suppose that the whole application would be a single thread world
> using that analogy. Objects are not 'bound' to a particular thread, they
> can be accessed freely from any thread and the user is responsible for
> protecting them - or preferably writing functional-like code to avoid
> collisions etc.
HPX uses executors to fine-control where which task is executed. Every
function which (potentially) creates a new task can optionally be used with
an instance of an executor (async(), future::then(), etc.)
> >> A future .then() or continuation is really just a type of callback too
> (broadly speaking).
> >
> > Not really, if I understand correctly
> > (http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/experimental/future/then). The functor
> object passed to then() is executed in an unspecified thread of execution,
> which makes it hard for the caller to (safely) pass data which might or
> might not be valid or relevant at the time the then functor executes.
By default in HPX the continuation is executed on the thread which has made
the future ready.
> > I however could not find out whether this also applied to HPX.
> > <<
> >
> > In HPX there are launch policies that can be used to control thread
> execution, the one that would come closest to what you are looking for
> would be
> > future<thing> =
> hpx::async(do_something_interesting()).then(hpx::launch::sync,
> do_another_interesting_thing());
> >
> > This tells the .then() continuation to execute the next function in the
> same context as the thread that completes the initial future.
>
> Does it mean a threadpool thread or the thread which started the
> asynchronous task?
The thread which makes the future ready. But executors can be used to
control the concrete thread (see above).
Regards Hartmut
---------------
http://boost-spirit.com
http://stellar.cct.lsu.edu
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk