Re: [boost] Is there any interest in non-owning pointer-like types?

Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in non-owning pointer-like types?
From: charleyb123 . (charleyb123_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-02-09 19:03:24

> <snip>, In that sense it is a perfectly cromulent word.
>
> Tony

LOL

Regarding context:
> - I've suggested cadged_ptr in the past - it is not a great word, as
> it it not very common, but it is actually the right meaning.
> And by not being common, it means we can imbue it with whatever
> meaning we'd like.  In that sense it is a perfectly cromulent word.

That's actually a very good point worth considering.