Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names

Subject: Re: [boost] Encoding address-model in library names
From: Michael Caisse (mcaisse-lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-05 22:02:03

On 7/5/17 15:43, Peter Dimov via Boost wrote:
> 
>> Furthermore, my answer to the last question depends on whether this is
>> an optional feature or a compulsory change. In case of the latter, I'm
>> against the change.
> 
> Special-casing Boost.Python to not support this feature would be a
> hassle and a bit hostile to its users, relegating them to a second
> class, but it's doable.

Having a library that works differently for naming than all the rest
seems like a non-starter to me.

If the community decides the change is good then it should be for all
libraries.

michael

-- 
Michael Caisse
Ciere Consulting
ciere.com