Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [review][mp11] Review report
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-08-03 07:49:07

Next message: Phil Bouchard: "Re: [boost] [BB++] Consensus"
Previous message: Phil Bouchard: "Re: [boost] [BB++] Consensus"
In reply to: Bjorn Reese: "[boost] [review][mp11] Review report"

Le 02/08/2017 Ã 13:22, Bjorn Reese via Boost a Ã©crit :
> I. VERDICT
>
> Mp11 is accepted unconditionally into Boost.

Congratulations Peter.

I don't share the argument that mp_ prefix is better for
standardization. Who knows what the committee will design/decide?
I believe namespaces are the "reason d'Ãªtre" to avoid such prefixes.
Anyway, the review is finished.

Thanks Peter, R. Bjorn and all the reviewers for making/helping it
possible to have a modern meta-programming library in Boost.

Hopping to see it in the next Boost release,
Vicente

P.S. I was on vacations during the review :(

Next message: Phil Bouchard: "Re: [boost] [BB++] Consensus"
Previous message: Phil Bouchard: "Re: [boost] [BB++] Consensus"
In reply to: Bjorn Reese: "[boost] [review][mp11] Review report"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk