Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30

Subject: Re: [boost] [review] The review of Boost.DoubleEnded starts today: September 21 - September 30
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-10-12 18:43:27

On 12/10/2017 19:17, Ion Gaztañaga via Boost wrote:
> On 12/10/2017 10:37, Thorsten Ottosen via Boost wrote:
> 
>> That means your design where capacity is the the full buffer length can
>> satisfy both situations. So I agree with you. But it also calls into 
>> question the need for anything else than capacity (i.e., there seem to 
>> be vanishingly little use for back_capacity/front_capacity and they 
>> probably confuse more than they help).
> 
> I agree. If capacity is the full buffer length, only back/front_capacity 
> make sense.

I wanted to say only back/front_FREE-capacity makes sense if capacity is 
the full buffer length.

Ion